THE MOST THREATENING EGFR MUTATION MAY BE THE ONE YOU DON’T SEE

Exon 20 insertion mutations in EGFR+ mNSCLC are more elusive and life‑threatening than common EGFR mutations. 1-9
These mutations differ from common mutations, such as L858R and exon 19 deletions, in how they are detected and treated, leaving patients at risk of rapid disease progression on current targeted therapies.1-9

Learn what makes EGFR exon 20 insertion mutations different

EGFR EXON 20 INSERTION MUTATIONS ARE THE 3RD MOST PREVALENT PRIMARY EGFR MUTATION, YET THEY ARE OFTEN UNDERDETECTED3,5,11

Current biomarker testing practices can make it difficult to identify these patients3,4,6,10

PCR-based tests, which are mutation‑specific, have technical limitations and can only detect a limited number of exon 20 insertion mutations3,6,10,11

Exon 20 insertion mutations cannot be treated effectively with most targeted therapies.2,5-8

Through the use of testing techniques that detect a broader range of mutations—either liquid or tissue-based NGS—and careful examination of biomarker test results, you can better understand the full picture of treatment options for your patients with EGFR‑positive mNSCLC.3,10,12

The NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines®) strongly advise broader molecular profiling for eligible patients with advanced or metastatic NSCLC, with the goal of identifying rare driver mutations.13*

It is recommended at this time that, when feasible, molecular testing be performed via a broad, panel-based approach, most typically performed by next-generation sequencing (NGS).13*


*The NCCN Guidelines® for NSCLC provide recommendations for certain individual biomarkers that should be tested and recommend testing techniques but do not endorse any specific commercially available biomarker assays or commercial laboratories.13

BUT ACCURATE DETECTION IS ONLY THE FIRST STEP IN FIGHTING THIS MUTATION

Disease driven by EGFR exon 20 insertion mutations does not respond well to most EGFR TKIs – Joshua Sabari, MD

MOST TKI THERAPIES INDICATED FOR COMMON EGFR MUTATIONS ARE NOT EFFECTIVE AT TREATING PATIENTS WITH EXON 20 INSERTION MUTATIONS, MAKING THEM MORE DIFFICULT TO TREAT THAN COMMON EGFR MUTATIONS2,5-8

Compared with common mutations, EGFR exon 20 insertion mutations reduce the size of the drug‑binding pocket and affinity for most TKIs indicated for common EGFR mutations2†

A763_Y764FQEA does not cause steric hindrance in the drug‑binding pocket and has been shown to be sensitive to currently approved TKIs.14

Response to most TKIs in treatment‑naïve patients:

PCR-Based Tests

EGFR exon 20 insertion mutations15,16

Exon 20 insertion mutations

EGFR TKIs indicated for classical EGFR mutations9

Classical <em>EGFR</em>

Classical EGFR exon 19 deletion or L858R mutation17

Results from a real-world analysis of treatment patterns.9

§The median overall survival was 38.6 months (95% CI, 34.5 to 41.8) in the osimertinib group and 31.8 months (95% CI, 26.6 to 36.0) in the comparator group (hazard ratio for death, 0.80; 95.05% CI, 0.64 to 1.00; P=0.046).17

The NCCN Guidelines recommend treating patients with mNSCLC with most EGFR exon 20 insertion mutations using first‑line systemic therapy, like platinum‑based chemotherapy.13||

||Exceptions include p.A763_Y764insFQEA and p.A763_Y764insLQEA. See the NCCN Guidelines for detailed recommendations for platinum‑based chemotherapy regimens for mNSCLC.13

Progression-free survival in treatment‑naïve patients with exon 20 insertion mutations:

Platinum‑based chemotherapy9,18-20

TKIs

TKIs in these trials included erlotinib, gefitinib, and afatinib.2

DON’T LET THIS MUTATION GET BY YOU. TEST FOR, FIND, AND APPROPRIATELY MANAGE EXON 20 INSERTION MUTATIONS.

YOUR PATIENTS’ LIVES DEPEND ON IT

SIGN UP TO RECEIVE THE LATEST INFORMATION REGARDING EXON 20 INSERTION MUTATIONS

First Name*

Last Name*

Email*

ZIP

*Required field

The information you provide will only be used by Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., our affiliates, and our service providers to provide you information about mNSCLC, including Janssen products, services, and programs relating to mNSCLC. You may request to be removed from our contact list by calling 1-800-JANSSEN (1-800-526-7736). Our Privacy Policy further governs the use of the information you provide. By providing your information and selecting the "Sign up" button, you indicate that you read, understand, and agree to these terms.

Loading
Your message has been sent. Thank you!

EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor; mNSCLC, metastatic non–small cell lung cancer; NCCN, National Comprehensive Cancer Network® (NCCN®); NGS, next‑generation sequencing; ORR, overall response rate; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; TKI, tyrosine kinase inhibitor.

References: 1. Chiang AC, Fernandes AW, Pavilack M, et al. EGFR mutation testing and treatment decisions in patients progressing on first- or second‑generation epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors. BMC Cancer. 2020;20(1):356. doi:10.1186/s12885-020-06826-0 2. Robichaux JP, Elamin YY, Tan Z, et al. Mechanisms and clinical activity of an EGFR and HER2 exon 20‑selective kinase inhibitor in non‑small cell lung cancer. Nat Med. 2018;24(5):638-646. doi:10.1038/s41591-018-0007-9 3. Riess JW, Gandara DR, Frampton GM, et al. Diverse EGFR exon 20 insertions and co‑occurring molecular alterations identified by comprehensive genomic profiling of NSCLC. J Thorac Oncol. 2018;13(10):1560-1568. doi:10.1016/j.jtho.2018.06.019 4. FoundationOne® CDx. Technical specifications. Foundation Medicine. Accessed April 30, 2022. https://assets.ctfassets.net/w98cd481qyp0/YqqKHaqQmFeqc5ueQk48w/0a34fcdaa3a71dbe460cdcb01cebe8ad/F1CDx_Technical_Specifications_072020.pdf 5. Arcila ME, Nafa K, Chaft JE, et al. EGFR exon 20 insertion mutations in lung adenocarcinomas: prevalence, molecular heterogeneity, and clinicopathologic characteristics. Mol Cancer Ther. 2013;12(2):220-229. doi:10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-12.0620 6. Oxnard GR, Lo PC, Nishino M, et al. Natural history and molecular characteristics of lung cancers harboring EGFR exon 20 insertions. J Thorac Oncol. 2013;8(2):179-84. doi:10.1097/JTO.0b013e3182779d18 7. Naidoo J, Sima C, Rodriguez K, et al. Epidermal growth factor receptor exon 20 insertions in advanced lung adenocarcinomas: clinical outcomes and response to erlotinib. Cancer. 2015;121(18):3212‑3220. doi:10.1002/cncr.29493 8. Chen D, Song Z, Cheng G. Clinical efficacy of first‑generation EGFR‑TKIs in patients with advanced non‑small‑cell lung cancer harboring EGFR exon 20 mutations. Onco Targets Ther. 2016;9:4181-4186. 9. Bazhenova L, Minchom A, Viteri S, et al. Comparative clinical outcomes for patients with advanced NSCLC harboring EGFR exon 20 insertion mutations and common EGFR mutations. Lung Cancer. 2021;162:154-161. doi:10.1016/j.lungcan.2021.10.020 10. Pennell NA, Arcila ME, Gandara DR, West H. Biomarker testing for patients with advanced non‑small cell lung cancer: Real‑world issues and tough choices. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2019;39(39):531-542. doi:10.1016/j.lungcan.2021.10.020 11. Bauml J, Viteri S, Minchom A, et al. Underdiagnosis of EGFR exon 20 insertion mutation variants: estimates from NGS-based real-world datasets. Presented at: the IASLC 2020 World Conference on Lung Cancer; January 28-31, 2021; Singapore. 12. Del Re M, Crucitta S, Gianfilippo G, et al. Understanding the mechanisms of resistance in EGFR‑positive NSCLC: from tissue to liquid biopsy to guide treatment strategy. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20(16):3951. doi:10.3390/ijms20163951 13. Referenced with permission from the NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines®) for Non‑Small Cell Lung Cancer V.3.2022. © National Comprehensive Cancer Network, Inc. 2022. All rights reserved. Accessed March 16, 2022. To view the most recent and complete version of the guideline, go online to NCCN.org. NCCN makes no warranties of any kind whatsoever regarding their content, use or application and disclaims any responsibility for their application or use in any way. 14. Yasuda H, Park E, Yun CH, et al. Structural, biochemical, and clinical characterization of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) exon 20 insertion mutations in lung cancer. [published correction appears in Sci Transl Med. 2014 Feb 26;6(225):225er1] Sci Transl Med. 2013;5(216):216ra177. doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.3007205 15. Kate S, Chougule A, Joshi A, et al. Outcome of uncommon EGFR mutation positive newly diagnosed advanced non‑small cell lung cancer patients: a single center retrospective analysis. Lung Cancer (Auckl). 2019;10:1-10. doi:10.2147/LCTT.S181406 16. Yang JC, Sequist LV, Geater SL, et al. Clinical activity of afatinib in patients with advanced non‑small‑cell lung cancer harbouring uncommon EGFR mutations: a combined post‑hoc analysis of LUX‑Lung 2, LUX‑Lung 3, and LUX‑Lung 6. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16(7):830-838. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00026-1 17. Ramalingam SS, Vansteenkiste J, Planchard D, et al. Overall survival with osimertinib in untreated, EGFR‑mutated advanced NSCLC. N Engl J Med. 2020;382(1):41-50. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1913662 18. Wang Y, Yang G, Li J, et al. Real-world treatment outcome of advanced Chinese NSCLC EGFR exon 20 insertion patients. J Clin Oncol. 2019;37(15)(suppl 9043). doi:10.1200/JCO.2019.37.15_suppl.9043 19. Zhao C, Li X, Su C, et al. P1.01-111 EGFR exon 20 insertion patients treated with first‑line chemotherapy in non‑small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol. 2018;13(10)(suppl S507). doi:10.1016/j.jtho.2018.08.668 20. Cardona AF, Rojas L, Zatarain‑Barrón ZL, et al. EGFR exon 20 insertion in lung adenocarcinomas among Hispanics (geno1.2‑CLICaP). Lung Cancer. 2018;125:265-272. doi:10.1016/j.lungcan.2018.10.007

© Janssen Biotech, Inc. 2022. All Rights Reserved. Your use of the information on this site is subject to the terms of our Legal Notice. Please see our Privacy Policy. This site is published by Janssen Biotech, Inc., which is solely responsible for its contents. The information is intended for the use of our customers, patients, and healthcare professionals in the United States only.




Sign up